- The African Brew
- Posts
- Fading Signal: Connectivity Dreams Meet African Realities
Fading Signal: Connectivity Dreams Meet African Realities
Why Starlink Can’t Connect Africa


Starlink, hailed as the great hope destined to illuminate the internet dark ages plaguing the African continent, has struggled to live up to its messianic expectations. In a world where connectivity should be as ubiquitous and fundamental as water, the reality is far thirstier, and believe you me, not just for clean drinking water.
This beacon of connectivity, linking even the most secluded locales to the bustling digital global village via satellites, showed its mettle in Ukraine, aiding drone defenses against a better-equipped Russian onslaught. Yet, despite these technological feats, Elon Musk’s venture is floundering in Africa due to prohibitive installation costs and steep monthly fees. Users grumble over erratic connections and sluggish speeds, These complaints are the least of Starlink’s worries on the continent.
For those unversed in the African business milieu, it's a playground dominated by monopolistic behemoths and state-owned enterprises, each entwined deeply with political machinations. In this environment, countries like Cameroon, Ghana, Zimbabwe, and South Africa have effectively barred Starlink, with South Africa imposing penalties up to a staggering 5 million rand (about $265,000) for unauthorized usage.
The governments hold the keys to the market kingdom, wielding licensing as both shield and sword against new entrants. These costly, annually renewable licenses not only stifle competition but also cascade financial burdens down to consumers, inflating costs. The underlying dread among these government gatekeepers? Private entities might actually deliver superior services at more appealing prices. Indeed, consumers, given the choice, would likely opt to pay more for reliable, fast internet.
This scenario sketches a broader picture of punishment—not by the unseen hand of the market but by the iron fist of corporate and governmental greed, indifferent to the civic value of internet access. It’s less about bringing light to the darkened corners of the continent and more about who controls the switch.
A system is corrupt when it is strictly profit-driven, not driven to serve the best interests of its people, but those of multinational corporations.
Reply